Can You Find Out Who Gave You Bad Review on Facebook Marketplace?
Hollywood seems adamant to profit from remakes and sequels that picture makers have no concern writing, producing or releasing. Rather than working difficult to generate new films — ones with novel plot devices, leads and stories from underrepresented communities and compelling cinematic visions, for example — the bigwigs of the American film industry are on a mission to quickly ruin whatsoever remnant of millennial childhood nostalgia.
So, it is with a heavy eye — and in recognition that January 10, 2021, marks five years since the passing of the absolutely legendary and incomparable David Bowie — that I am forced to address the announcement of a Labyrinth sequel. Now, does the original film require, necessitate or even hint at a sequel? Is the lead thespian from the original pic prepared to make an appearance? Is the original director yet available? The answer to these questions is a single, resounding "NO." And yet, here we are. Sigh.
Allow me to take a brief moment to discuss why a Labyrinth sequel is an awful, terrible, no-good idea.
A Bowie-Less Labyrinth Sequel Will Be a Travesty
The upcoming Labyrinth sequel faces some tough challenges. For starters, it's going to be missing its eternal, androgynous Jareth the Goblin King — a.k.a. the incomparable David Bowie. In 2016, the iconic genre- and gender-angle rock star lost a long battle with liver cancer. His failing health was a well-kept secret, and fans and admirers from all over the world mourned his untimely passing.
If you believe that Bowie's absence from a Labyrinth sequel is more a casting challenge than a reason to cancel the unabridged project, I'd recommend that you go back and watch the original 1986 moving picture. Bowie's presence extends beyond his insanely flustered hairdo, gigantic codpiece and cool charismatic demeanor — the man also wrote and performed more than half of the motion-picture show's soundtrack.
Seeing Bowie perform as Jareth is much like watching him as Ziggy Stardust. It can be challenging to separate the truth from the fiction of these performances, every bit Bowie becomes so engrossed in his characterization that he only ceases to be himself. Even as an adult, information technology'due south hard to spotter Jareth the Goblin Male monarch prance, dance and sing without occasionally stopping to recall, "Wow. That actually is David Bowie. And, aye, I will 'Dance the Magic Trip the light fantastic' downwards my hallway."
I'thousand sorry, but information technology's incommunicable for a casting director to find a multitalented actor/musician to fill up Bowie's shoes in an upcoming sequel. Information technology's also a challenge to imagine any viable reason why the original — seemingly immortal — Goblin Male monarch would have suddenly changed form. This type of defoliation only deepens when because what might go of the Labyrinth'due south creatures.
The Absence of Jim Henson's Artistic Genius
Jim Henson, the mastermind behind the Muppets, directed the original Labyrinth film. His masterful puppetry showed a depth of skill unmatched by rival puppeteers, and in a time without impressive CGI graphics, he was one of the go-to guys for practical special effects. Sadly, Henson passed abroad in 1990. Since that time, at that place have been no less than five theatrical releases with his charming Muppet characters — and they've all been awful.
Some might have those movies as a sign that Henson's absenteeism is no big deal when attempting to make a sequel. They would be incredibly incorrect. A Labyrinth sequel without Bowie AND Jim Henson would exist like a Mrs. Doubtfire sequel without Robin Williams. (Don't you dare, 20th Century Fox!) But stop thinking about it and appreciate this magic for what it is!
Making a sequel to the Labyrinth movie without using Henson's puppets would be like George Lucas abandoning practical puppetry from his Star Wars franchise in favor of poorly-generated computer graphics. Oh…that's already happened, and the response has been less-than-stellar. Fans who have grown up watching a specific film are bound to feel slighted, misunderstood or merely plain cheated when that moving picture ends upward lost in technological translation.
Not convinced that fans don't want a CGI-heavy Labyrinth remake? Take a look at how The Panthera leo King fanbase (and critics) reacted to the CGI "live-activity"' Disney remake. Here's a spoiler: They didn't like it.
A Projection Fueled past Profits, Not Passions
All of this begs the question, "Why are these executives light-green-lighting so many '80s remakes and sequels right now?" Unfortunately, the answer lies in nostalgia-based turn a profit. Academics have long studied consumer behavior, and it seems that recent studies have not fallen on deafened ears.
In 2014, the Periodical of Consumer Research published findings on the connection between nostalgia and coin-spending habits. They discovered that people are more willing to spend money when they're feeling sentimental or nostalgic. Advertising executives and film producers accept taken this tidbit of information and run with it.
That's why our current moving picture manufacture is flooded with remakes and unasked-for sequels, specially to icons from the 1980s and 1990s. Children from that era are at present full-fledged adults with existential dread about the time to come as climate change, pandemics and political chaos exit generations clamoring for familiar, comforting nostalgia.
Merely rather than re-releasing original footage on updated media (recollect Blu-ray and 4K downloads), the pic industry would rather have existing intellectual holding and rebrand it for the younger generation. In most cases, the outcome is an alienated original audition and a disinterested youth. This is all done in the proper noun of and for the sake of profit.
So Please, Exit This Gem of a Picture Alone
A movie shouldn't exist pre-judged as adept or bad, of course, but should instead be judged past its merit, reception and lasting impact. Still, even the nearly avant-garde hologram engineering science could not revive Bowie's onscreen presence (NOR SHOULD IT). And no amount of CGI could supercede the actuality and wonder of Henson'due south creations.
The only thing that could remain consistent between the original Labyrinth film and its proposed sequel is its main screenwriter, Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame and glory). Simply equally of this moment, there'due south no discussion from the aging Brit as to his possible involvement in writing a sequel.
As a result, there's little hope that a Labyrinth ii would be anything more than a shameless, soulless cash catch aimed at adults who long for the simpler, stranger globe that lay before them during the '80s. Any project based on turn a profit, not passion, is doomed to neglect, and that'due south why I'thousand non looking forward to the mess of a sequel that undoubtedly lies ahead.
mccalebalidereces.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.ask.com/entertainment/labyrinth-sequel-bad-idea?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "Can You Find Out Who Gave You Bad Review on Facebook Marketplace?"
Post a Comment